| |
December 2007
guest feature
New Stormwater Regulations Promote
Green Roofing and Waterproofing
By William F. Foley, CSI, CCPR, Waterproofing and Greenroof Design
Consultant
Publisher's Note: This is an
updated article originally published in the Summer 2007 issue of
Applicator Magazine, published by the Sealant, Waterproofing &
Restoration Institute.
The Stormwater Management Problem
One only needs to listen to
the news or read the local paper to find all too common stories of
flooding and property damage caused by seemingly routine rainfall
events. The increased frequency of these events indicates that current
stormwater management regulations are inadequate.
For environmental reasons we need to
consider roofs and plazas part of the overall stormwater management
program in most densely populated areas in North America. This inclusion
will require a paradigm shift in roofing and waterproofing design from
getting water off of our buildings as quickly as possible to slowing and
retaining water flow on our rooftops. This will also require new
designs, new systems and increased skill and dedication to fulfill this
purpose.
In addition to the more obvious effects as flooding and erosion,
rainfall also washes over impervious surfaces so that the initial flush
of runoff can carry high concentrations of pollutants to nearby drinking
water supplies, waterways, beaches and properties. Pollution washed from
the land surface by rainfall is called “non-point” source pollution.
Local stormwater management programs seek
to protect properties and aquatic resources from damages caused by
increased volume, frequency and peak rate of stormwater runoff. Further,
these programs seek to protect those resources from increased
“non-point” source pollution carried by stormwater runoff.
Quantity and Quality
Quantity of Stormwater
Runoff
Pervious surfaces,
such as meadows and woodlands, absorb and infiltrate rainfall hence
generating little runoff. Urban landscape typically cover(s) such areas
with impervious surfaces, such as, roads, pavement and rooftops. These
impervious surfaces generate runoff every time it rains. (A typical
conventional roof generates nine times more runoff than a woodland area
of the same size!) The quantity of runoff from these areas quickly
overwhelms natural channels and streams, often causing channel erosion,
localized flooding and property damage.
Quality of Stormwater
Runoff
In our
increasingly urbanized landscape, impervious surfaces collect chemical
and particulate pollutants from various sources. Rainfall washes these
surfaces so that the initial flush of runoff can carry high
concentrations of harmful pollutants to nearby drinking water supplies,
waterways, beaches and properties.
|
Traditional Solutions
Traditional stormwater treatment practices fall into five major
categories: stormwater ponds, stormwater wetlands, infiltration
practices, filtering practices, and open channels. Within each category,
there are several design variations. Stormwater filtering systems
include surface sand filters, perimeter filters, organic filters,
underground filters, pocket sand filters, rain gardens and bioretention.
Stormwater infiltration systems include infiltration trenches, shallow
infiltration basins and porous pavement.
Green Roof Contribution to an Integrated
Stormwater Management Plan
Many municipalities and states in the U.S. are now introducing new
stormwater regulations that limit impervious surfaces (such as roofs and
paved areas) and encourage and even reward building developers for the
inclusion of greenroofs that are recognized as pervious surface area.
The hydrologic response of a green roof bears closer resemblance to a
lawn or meadow than impervious surface. The green roof system is
composed of multiple layers including waterproofing, a drainage layer,
engineered planting media, and specially selected plants. Vegetated roof
covers can be optimized to achieve water quantity and quality benefits.
Through the appropriate selection of materials, vegetated covers can
provide rainfall retention and detention functions.
Unlike conventional roofing, green roofs promote retention, slow
release, and evapotranspiration of precipitation. This stormwater
management technique is very effective in reducing the volume and
velocity of stormwater runoff from roofs.
Water Quantity Control
The use of green roofs to improve urban
stormwater management is one of the most important benefits this
technology offers. Green roofs attenuate peak flows and reduce the total
volume of stormwater runoff by retaining rain water in the growing media
and returning a portion of it back to the atmosphere through
evapotranspiration. The runoff flows leaving the green rooftop, and
ultimately draining to receiving waters, are significantly decreased and
delayed relative to peak flows in the receiving water system. This helps
to minimize downstream channel erosion, flooding risk, and negative
impacts on aquatic ecosystems.
Studies undertaken in North America and Europe indicate average percent
retention rate reported in these studies was 60%, ranging from a low of
39% to a high of 72%. Substrate thickness had a positive influence on
rainfall retention in studies where more than one substrate thickness
was monitored.
The ability of greenroofs to attenuate runoff peak flows has also been
demonstrated in several monitoring studies. A monitoring study of a flat
extensive greenroof undertaken between 2002 and 2003 in Portland, Oregon
(Hutchinson et al., 2003) found that peak precipitation run-on rates
ranged from 0.041 to 0.193 ft3/sec while flow rates running off the
greenroof were only 0.008 to 0.012 ft3/sec. The Toronto and Region
Conservation Authority (2006) reported peak
flow reduction rates of 50% for runoff events greater than 40 mm and 87%
for events between 10 and 29 mm. Rain from smaller events was often
completely retained by the green roof. The chart below from the American Society
of Landscape Architects test greenroof in Washington, D.C. shows the
relationship of rainfall to roof retention atop their headquarter
greenroof (2006):
Green roofs also delay runoff peaks,
which helps to ensure that peak discharges to receiving waters do not
occur when the stream is being heavily impacted by stormwater flows from
other impervious surfaces. A study of an extensive green roof in Toronto
by the National Research Council of Canada reported runoff delays
relative to a conventional roof of between 20 and 40 minutes on average
(Liu and Minor, 2005) and found average runoff delays of 30 minutes on a
green roof with a thicker growing medium.
Improved Runoff Quality
Green roofs help to decrease the total load of contaminants conveyed to
receiving water systems in two key ways: (i) reducing contaminant
concentrations and (ii) reducing total runoff volumes from the roof.
Research has shown that runoff from a green roof tends to have lower
concentrations of contaminants such as aromatic hydrocarbons, heavy
metals, and suspended solids. This occurs because the green roof
material does not leach these contaminants into runoff the way a
conventional roofing surface does, and also because the green roof soil
and plants remove atmospherically deposited contaminants though various
chemical, physical and biological processes.
When rain falls on a green roof, the impact is absorbed by the surface
soil or substrate, before it percolates slowly through the media, past a
geotextile filter and into the drainage cell. On a conventional roof,
the impact of rain and flow of rainwater on the hard surface leaches
pollutants from the roofing material that were not deposited
atmospherically.
Several studies have shown that leaching of pollutants from conventional
roofing materials can result in very high runoff concentrations of
metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and other pollutants.
PAHs are chemical compounds that can be point source pollutants (e.g.
oil spill) or non-point source (e.g. atmospheric deposition) and are one
of the most widespread organic pollutants. Some of them are known or
suspected carcinogens, and are linked to other health problems. They are
primarily formed by incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels
such as wood, coal, diesel, fat, tobacco, or incense. Tar also contains
PAHs. (Wikipedia, 2007) Atmospheric deposition is another
major source of contaminants in rooftop runoff.
In a roof garden, soil adsorption, plant uptake, microbial activity, and
filtration are all processes which either remove contaminants from the
runoff or prevent atmospherically deposited contaminants from entering
runoff. The retention of runoff by greenroofs discussed earlier
translates into a significant decrease in the volume of water discharged
to receiving water systems. These lower flow volumes in turn result in
reduced contaminant loads in runoff from the roof.
Hydrologic System Impact
In older municipalities in which combined sewer systems are used, green
roofs can be an important stormwater management technology as they do
not take up valuable space at ground level. The implementation of green
roofs in built up areas helps to reduce overall flows to storm sewers
and minimizes combined sewer overflows. When combined sewer systems
overflow from wastewater treatment facilities raw sewage dumping occurs,
including human waste directly into rivers, lakes and bays. Greenroofs
are another way to reduce this incidence and translates into fewer beach
closures and the overall improved health and aesthetic value of rivers,
waterfronts and coastlines.
Stormwater Management Drivers for Green Roof Infrastructure
Besides stormwater management the private and public benefits and
incentives to build greenroofs are many. Green roofs offer public
benefits including; aesthetics, waste diversion (less refuse from
re-roofs), reduction in urban heat island effect, improved air quality,
improved quality of life and local job creation. Private owner benefits
of green roofs include: improved energy efficiency, increased membrane
durability, fire retardation, noise reduction, and marketability of
green roof amenities.
Stormwater management is probably the single most important driver in
green roof infrastructure growth. Many local stormwater management
regulations are beginning recognize green roofs as part of an integrated
system of stormwater flow reduction and treatment. The key benefit for
green roof proponents is that when a green roof is integrated into
stormwater design of a building and site it is very difficult to value
engineer the system off the project or change the design criteria. To do
so would cause a cost increase in other systems or perhaps affect the
area for occupied space or available leased space by decreasing the
allowable building footprint.
Examples of local and state stormwater legislation that incorporate
green roof technology can be found in Philadelphia, PA; Minneapolis, MN,
Seattle, WA and Portland, OR. It is certain that many other state and
local stormwater management authorities have moved in that direction.
Green Rooftop Credit Program / Portland, Oregon
The term "green rooftops" refers to a few practices that detain and
treat stormwater runoff on rooftops using vegetation on the roof
surface. Several different options exist, including variations on the
type of vegetation used, and the specific design of the green roof. The
criteria presented below are adapted from the Portland Stormwater Manual
criteria for the Eco-Roof.
|
Green Rooftops: Summary |
|
Goals |
Encourage the use of vegetated cover on rooftops to detain and
treat rooftop runoff. |
|
Stormwater Management Objectives |
Water Quality/ Recharge |
Subtract the total green rooftop area from the site's impervious
cover. |
|
Channel Protection, Flood Control |
Reflect green rooftops as woods in good condition. |
Example
In the green rooftop credit, green rooftops are subtracted from the
total site impervious cover, and assigned a curve number for woods in
good condition. In order to receive the credit, green rooftops must meet
the following criteria:
• The system shall include a 6" soil bed, with a silt loam texture.
• The soil bed shall be underlain with a 2" gravel layer, and these two
layers shall be separated by a layer of filter fabric.
• An impermeable layer shall be placed between the rooftop and the
gravel layer.
• The roof shall have a maximum slope of 25%.
• The roof shall be designed to hold an additional 25 lbs/sf, beyond
minimum regional design criteria.
• Vegetation shall be established within two growing seasons.
• Vegetation should require minimal fertilization, watering and
pesticides.
• A 2" mulch layer shall be immediately placed above the soil layer to
prevent erosion.
• The vegetation and mulch layer shall be maintained at least quarterly,
removing dead vegetation and eroded mulch.
• If the rooftop is used as an amenity (e.g., a rooftop sitting area) as
well as to detain stormwater, credit shall only be applied to pervious
sections of the rooftop.
• The credit shall only apply for households and businesses where owners
sign a maintenance agreement.
The water quality and recharge credit can
be calculated with the following equation:
C = (AGR/AI)WQv
Where:
C = Green Rooftop Credit (ac-ft)
AGR = Green Rooftops (acres)
AI = Site Impervious Area (acres)
WQv = Original Water Quality Volume (ac-ft)
The recharge and water quality volumes are then reduced by the credit,
C.
Quantity credit is achieved by assigning disconnected rooftops a curve
number equal to forest in good condition. The example below illustrates
how this credit would be applied.
Summary of a Rainfall
Event at the Center for Green Roof Research at Penn State
Green roofs retain and detain (slow down) stormwater runoff. The graphs
below are a compilation of data from research buildings (3 greened and 3
non-green) at the Center for Green Roof Research at Penn State located
at Rock Springs, PA. Spring, 2003 was very wet and cool.
|
Summary of a Rainfall Event
Green roofs retain and detain (slow down) stormwater runoff. The
graphs below are a compilation of data from research buildings
(3 greened and 3 non-green) at the Center for Green Roof
Research at Penn State located at Rock Springs, PA. Spring, 2003
was very wet and cool. |
|
|
|
|
Start |
5/31/03 4:33 AM |
|
End |
6/1/03 10:33 AM |
|
Duration (hrs) |
30
|
|
Interevent interval (hrs) |
51.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inches |
|
|
Total rain |
1.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Runoff non-greened |
0.984 ±.075 |
|
|
Runoff greened |
0.746 ±.018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peak
runoff |
inches/5min |
% of
rain |
|
Rain |
.05 |
100 |
|
Non-greened |
.041 |
82 |
|
Greened |
.011 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Percent runoff |
|
|
|
Non-greened |
88.65% |
|
|
Greened |
67.21% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage retained |
|
|
|
Non-greened |
11.35% |
|
|
Greened |
32.79% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount retained (in) |
0.364 |
|
|
Cumulative (5/23-6/1) |
inches |
|
|
Total rain |
2.21 |
|
|
Total retained by green roofs |
1.045 |
47.29% |
| | |
Another key driver that involves
stormwater management affecting greenroof infrastructure growth is
LEED®-NC. Under the USGBC LEED® program many more buildings are seeking
LEED® certification. Greenroofs can contribute to LEED® in credits in up
to as many as 15 different categories. Greenroofs contribute via
stormwater management in two specific LEED® categories:
Stormwater Design: Quantity Control (SS Credit 6.1), 1 point. A
Green Roof System stores stormwater in growing medium and in
strategically placed water stormwater retention/drainage composites to
reduce runoff and promote evapotranspiration.
 |
 |
|
Left: This
example of a drain flow restrictor uses ZinCo FD-60 drainage
with a separate Inspection Chamber KS-12 on a greenroof. Right: This ZinCo
FD-25 greenroof
material section shows how the growing medium holds water,
the drainage composite holds water and the thick fabric
layer just beneath the drainage composite is a moisture
retention mat. |
Stormwater Design: Quality Control (SS Credit 6.2), 1 point. A
Green Roof System filters stormwater with microbial activity, absorption
in the growing medium, filtering through the growing medium and filter
fabrics and through plant uptake and evapotranspiration.
Many government agencies such as the GSA are making LEED® certification
a requirement thus encouraging greenroof stormwater design
consideration. Similarly, some municipalities such as New York City and
Washington, D.C. have adopted new statutes. “Local Law 86” in New York
City requires that all municipal buildings or municipally funded (many
private) projects meet LEED®-NC Silver Certification. In Washington,
D.C. “The Green Building Act of 2006” requires all new construction,
public and private over a certain size to meet LEED®-NC Silver
Certification. This has already greatly impacted the number of
greenroofs in planning and design in those cities.
As contractors, consultants, designers and manufacturers in the industry
of waterproofing we must all be very excited about this new opportunity
for green roofs and the link to stormwater management. Stormwater
management designs must have the best waterproofing systems installed by
the most qualified applicators due to the critical nature of storing and
slowing the flow of water above occupied space. Many of us have been
disappointed at times over the promise of green roof designs that were
value engineered due to cost overruns or budget constraints.
The stormwater management regulated and
designed systems must be built to meet the expectation of the overall
stormwater management system. Therefore, the opportunity to design high
quality, integrated systems that will be built with much more frequency
is upon us. As others in the green roof industry have been quoted, “We
are finally at the tipping point where the green roof market in the
North America is about to explode.”
William F Foley, CSI, CCPR, is the Managing Partner
of Enviro-Plane Consulting, LLC. In 2006, Enviro-Plane Consulting, LLC
was founded in part to promote, specify and help to maintain building
envelope infrastructure as it relates to environmentally sustainable and
energy efficient building envelope design and implementation. Bill has
been active in commercial construction contracting for more than 25
years. For the past 18 years Bill has worked in building envelope
materials product representation, new product development and marketing
strategy.
In 1994, Bill earned Certified Construction Product Representative
(CCPR) from Construction Specifications Institute and has served in
various positions there. Bill has authored numerous articles appearing
in industry magazines, and since 2003 Bill has been directly involved in
the advancement of building envelope technology helping to develop,
register and deliver air barrier and green roof AIA programs all over
the East Coast. Contact Bill at: 610.390.1068 or visit:
www.enviroplane.com.
|